Untitled Post
3 years ago
Executed
This is a ReferendumV2 whose proposer address (HACNArtaeeEkA34S5pBTUbHsDenJ51wrJDsp4Q2WkKiFTy7) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this proposer can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.
Comments (3)
Requested
100.00 DOT
Proposal Passed
Hey @HACNArtaeeEkA34S5pBTUbHsDenJ51wrJDsp4Q2WkKiFTy7 Please provide information on your proposals to clarify what we're voting on and why. Until then - also NAY here.
#155 is requesting retroactive funding -- You voted Nay #144 pays retroactively for services already delivered -- You voted Nay #150 is requesting funding up front -- You voted Aye Exactly which part(s) of the linked policy are you going to follow?
I wonder about the same thing - this seems more like voting Nay on all content-related stuff rather than deciding whether the proposal asks for retroactive payment or not.
Polkassembly is now a read-only archive. Commenting is disabled.